Troutman v. Wolfe
David S. Troutman |
Wolfe |
5:2022cv00228 |
September 19, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S #9 MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Petitioner's petition is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is instructed to STRIKE this case from the active docket of this Court. Signed by District Judge John Preston Bailey on 11/10/22. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/10/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 12 RETURN RECEIPT as to #11 ROSEBORO ORDER TO PETITIONER. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/19/2022. (nmm) |
Filing 11 ROSEBORO ORDER TO PETITIONER re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Wolfe. Within 21 days from the date of this Order, the pro se party shall file any opposition to the motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 10/17/22. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/17/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by Wolfe re #9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Palmer, Jordan) |
Filing 9 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Wolfe. (Palmer, Jordan) |
Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #4 Order to Show Cause. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/26/22. (lmm) |
Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT as to #3 Notice. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 9/21/22. (lmm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan Vincent Palmer on behalf of Wolfe (Palmer, Jordan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Maximillian F. Nogay on behalf of Wolfe (Nogay, Maximillian) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 9/22/22. (Pro Se Petitioner via CM/rrr; AUSA via US Mail) (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/22/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF GENERAL GUIDELINES FOR APPEARING PRO SE IN FEDERAL COURT. (ag)(pro se PET cm rrr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/19/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (ag). |
Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNC003515. (ag) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Wolfe, filed by David S. Troutman. (Attachments: #1 Criminal Docket 5:18-cr-13 Northern District of Ohio (Akron), #2 Envelope)(ag) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Troutman v. Wolfe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: David S. Troutman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Wolfe | |
Represented By: | Christopher James Prezioso |
Represented By: | Jordan Vincent Palmer |
Represented By: | Maximillian F. Nogay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.