Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wolf v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv04425
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wolf
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing, SSAOGCOMMS and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WOLF v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv12176
Plaintiff:
CHRIS WOLF
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06534
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06544
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Hall et al
as 2:2026cv04004
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lynn Smith
Defendant:
Karl Hall, Miriam Klinger, Jim Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 26-2525
Petitioner:
TOWAKI KOMATSU
Respondent:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NICOLE AARONSON, KAYLA ARSLANIAN and others
Cat and Dog Inc v. Stubhub, Inc.
as 2:2026cv02024
Plaintiff:
CAT AND DOG, INC.,d/b/a THE HOWLIN WOLF
Defendant:
STUBHUB, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Shomari Bowens v. City of Minneapolis, et al
as 26-2807
Plaintiff:
Shomari Bowens
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, Hennepin County, Rashida Hill, individually and in her official capacity and others
Drakewyck v. Aurora Public Schools, et al
as 26-1355
Plaintiff:
KATE WOLF DRAKEWYCK
Defendant:
AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS, MELINDA DAVIS and HALEH TORBAGHAN
Falcon v. Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC
as 3:2026cv02601
Plaintiff:
Angel Falcon
Defendant:
Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
