Bell-Veney v. Searls
Elan Bell-Veney |
Shelby Searls |
5:2022cv00232 |
September 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
John Preston Bailey |
James P Mazzone |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Section 2254 Petition Amended Reply filed by Elan Bell-Veney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Lambert, Sherman) |
Filing 9 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Section 2254 Petition filed by Elan Bell-Veney. (Lambert, Sherman) |
Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT as to #7 Order. SERVICE ACCEPTED on 10/28/22. (lmm) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF RIGHT TO RESPOND. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 10/25/22. (Petitioner via CM/rrr) NEF REGEN to correct MJ signature (lmm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/25/2022: #1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (lmm). |
Filing 6 Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Section 2254 Petition filed by Shelby Searls. (Niday, Mary) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Section 2254 Petition by Shelby Searls. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit #1 Docket Sheet Case No. 15-F-183, #2 Exhibit #2 Indictment Case No. 15-F-183, #3 Exhibit #3 Plea & Sent'g Hr'g Tr. Case No. 15-F-183, #4 Exhibit #4 Plea Agreement Case No. 15-F-183, #5 Exhibit #5 Plea & Sent'g Order Case No. 15-F-183, #6 Exhibit #6 Petitioner's Direct Appeal Brief Case No. 17-0606, #7 Exhibit #7 State's Summary Response Case No. 17-0606, #8 Exhibit #8 Petitioner's Reply Brief Case No. 17-0606, #9 Exhibit #9 Memorandum Decision in Case No. 17-0606, #10 Exhibit #10 Order Denying Petition for Rehearing Case No. 17-0606, #11 Exhibit #11 Docket Sheet Case No. 19-C-3, #12 Exhibit #12 Final Order Denying Habeas Petition Case No. 19-C-3, #13 Exhibit #13 Petition for Habeas Appeal Case No. 20-0342, #14 Exhibit #14 Respondent's Brief Case No. 20-0342, #15 Exhibit #15 Memorandum Decision Case No. 20-0342, #16 Exhibit #16 October 28, 2021 Mandate)(Niday, Mary) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Beth Niday on behalf of Shelby Searls (Niday, Mary) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Mazzone on 9/27/22. (Attorney Villanueva-Matkovich via US Mail w/Petition) (lmm) |
Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number WVNM002133 (lmm) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Shelby Searls, filed by Elan Bell-Veney. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter) (hand delivered by counsel) (lmm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bell-Veney v. Searls | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Elan Bell-Veney | |
Represented By: | Sherman L. Lambert, Sr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Shelby Searls | |
Represented By: | Karen C. Villanueva-Matkovich |
Represented By: | Mary Beth Niday |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.