Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney, Angel Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Searls
as 5:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Quantel Saunders
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LLewellyn v. Felton et al
as 3:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Llewellyn
Defendant:
CCI Scott Felton, CO Monica Pealer, William Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LLewellyn v. Felton et al
as 2:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Llewellyn
Defendant:
CCI Scott Felton, CO Monica Pealer, WVDCR Commissioner William Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funt v. Searls
as 5:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Steven Funt
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, William Marshall, III, Jeff Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Jones et al
as 5:2023cv00274
Petitioner:
Jasman Raheem Montgomery
Respondent:
Gregory Jones, Shelby Searls and Investigators
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meadows v. Searls
as 2:2023cv00399
Petitioner:
Eric Meadows
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
