Gresham v. Norfolk Southern, et al
| Lathronea P. Gresham |
| Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk and Western Railway Co. |
| 1:1992cv01003 |
| October 28, 1992 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| Mercer |
| David A. Faber |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
240
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The referral to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn is VACATED. Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-01426 is DISMISSED and the Clerk is directed to close that civil action. Ms. Gresham is further reminded that she is PROHIBITED from filing any further motions or papers in cases 1:92-01003 and 1:92-01400 unless such motions or papers are certified as non-frivolous by an attorney. The Clerk is directed "not to accept any further motions or papers filed by plaintiff in these actions unless they are so certified." With the exception noted above, any documents received by Ms. Gresham should henceforth be returned to her unless they clearly indicate an intent to file a new civil action. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 2/27/2019. (cc: plaintiff(s), pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing
188
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff is PROHIBITED from filing any further motions or papers in these cases unless such motions or papers are certified as non-frivolous by an attorney. The Court further DIRECTS the Clerk of Court not to accept any further motions or papers filed by plaintiff in these actions unless they are so certified. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 4/12/2016. (cc: Plaintiff, pro se; attys) (mk)
|
|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: On 8/28/2015, the 4CCA sent a 177 letter to the Clerk of this Court indicating that the 4CCA considered Document Nos. 173 or 174 to be "a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) (for judgment), 52(b) (to amend or make additional findings), 59 (to alter or amend judgment or for new trial), or 60 (to vacate) filed within 28 days of entry of judgment." To the extent that plaintiff's filings (Document Nos. 173 or 174) are any of the foregoing, the motions are DENIED for the reasons expressed in the Memorandum Opinion and Order of 7/28/2015. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 9/3/2015. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing
172
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 159 MOTION to Reopen Case and denying as moot all other motions filed: Norfolk Southern Corporation's 162 MOTION to Strike and for Sanctions; Plaintiff's 163 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction; Norfolk Southern Corporation's 165 MOTION for Order Prohibiting Further Filings; Plaintiff's 166 MOTION for Extension of Time to File; Plaintiff's 167 MOTION to Vacate; Plaintiff's 167 MOTION for Joinder; Plai ntiff's 167 MOTION to Amend; Plaintiff's 167 MOTION for Default Judgment Pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2), FRCivP; Plaintiff's 167 MOTION to Intervene and Plaintiff's 169 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages. In addition, Plaintiff is hereby warned that any further filing of frivolous motions will result in a pre-filing review order. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 7/28/2015. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
