Collins v. United States of America
1:2006cv00490 |
June 21, 2006 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
David A. Faber |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 155 MEMORANDUM OPINION as to Warren Collins ADOPTING 152 the PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort; DISMISSING 141 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate (2255) and DIRECTING the Clerk to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 9/30/2009. (cc: Warren Collins, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb) |
Filing 152 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re: 141 MOTION by Warren Collins to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255. Cross Reference Criminal Case Number 1:02-00102-0 01. RECOMMENDING that the District Court DISMISS Movant's Motion under 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 and REMOVE this matter from the Court's docket. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 5/22/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 5/6/2009. (cc: Movant, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Collins v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.