Padgett v. United States of America
1:2006cv00724 |
September 20, 2006 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
David A. Faber |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 359 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 355 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge VanDervort. Court GRANTS plaintiff's 308 motion to dismiss, DISMISSES plaintiff's 300 Motion for Correction of Clerical Errors in the Judgment and DISMISSES this case and directs the Clerk to remove this action from the court's active docket. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 6/19/2009. (cc: plaintiff, pro se & counsel of record) (mjp) Modified document number on 6/22/2009 (jkk). |
Filing 355 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort RECOMMENDING that the District Court GRANT 308 Movant's MOTION to Dismiss; DISMISS 300 Movant's MOTION for Correction of Clerical Errors in the Judgment and r emove this case from the Court's docket. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 6/8/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 5/19/2009. (cc: Movant, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Padgett v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.