Osborne et al v. Columbia Helicopters, Inc. et al
| Earl Osborne and Freda Osborne |
| Columbia Helicopters, Inc. and Wagner Forest Management, Ltd. |
| 1:2008cv00305 |
| May 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| P.I.: Other Office |
| McDowell |
| David A. Faber |
| Both |
| Diversity |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 78 Plaintiffs' MOTION for Protective Order and granting 85 Defendant Columbia Helicopters, Inc.'s MOTION for Leave to Extend Duration of Plaintiff Mr. Osborne's Deposition. Mr. Osborne's de position shall continue after Plaintiffs have provided verified, full and complete answers to Columbia's written discovery for no longer than an additional "1 day of 7 hours." It is further ORDERED in view of 100 Columbia's Moti on to Compel that Columbia's counsel shall inform the Court promptly whether Plaintiffs have now provided full and complete responses to its First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents in conformity with the Federal Rule s of Civil Procedure and/or what attempts have been made to facilitate them without Court involvement. Plaintiffs shall respond to Columbia's Motion to Compel within the time frame established by the Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 7/20/2009. (cc: counsel of record) (arb) Modified on 7/20/2009 to correct minor typographical error (mjp).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
