Kanode v. Swope, et al
| Michael J. Kanode, Sr. |
| Jose Centeno, J. D. Ellision, Malissa Clemons, Krista Ellison, Southern Highlands Community Mental Health Center, Inc., Sherry Kanode, West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources and Child Protection Services, State of West Virginia, Anthony Bisaha, Derek C. Swope, Scott Ash, Mike L. Gills, Mercer County Sheriffs Department, Michael P. Cooke and McGinnis E. Hatfield, Jr. |
| 1:2009cv01530 |
| December 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| Mercer |
| David A. Faber |
| R. Clarke VanDervort |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's 15 Motion to Extend Time to File Objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation. His objections filed on 3/19/2012 are deemed to have been timely filed. The Court ADOPTS the [1 3] Proposed Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge VanDervort; DENIES Plaintiff's 1 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees; DISMISSES Plaintiff's complaints and/or petitions for writ of mandamus and directs the Clerk to rem ove these matters from the Court's docket. The 14 Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on 2/28/2012 was filed after Magistrate Judge VanDevort issued his Proposed Findings and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 9/28/2012. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
