Robbins v. Batts
Christina Lynn Robbins |
Myron Batts |
1:2010cv01373 |
December 10, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
Greenbrier |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: having considered Petitioner's claims in this matter and circumstances apparent from the record of the proceedings in the Northern District of Indiana, it is ORDERED that this matter is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of Indiana and the Clerk is directed to remove this matter from the Court's docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 1/4/2011. (cc: Petitioner, pro se and Clerk of Court for NDIN) (mjp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Robbins v. Batts | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Christina Lynn Robbins | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Myron Batts | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.