Deakins, Sr. et al v. Pack et al
Plaintiff: Harry E. Deakins, Sr. and Kay F. Deakins
Defendant: T. S. Pack, J. C. Long, R. J. Jackson, J. R. Baker, C. M. Wade, P. H. Shrewsbury and John and Jane Does 1 - 10
Case Number: 1:2010cv01396
Filed: December 21, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Bluefield Office
County: Mercer
Presiding Judge: Irene C. Berger
Presiding Judge: R. Clarke VanDervort
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 268 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the court ADOPTS the 224 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge VanDervort GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 181 MOTION for Summary Judgment against Kay Deakins filed by P. H. Shrewsbury, J. R. Baker, J. C. Long, R. J. Jackson, D. B. Rogers, C. M. Wade, T. S. Pack, 179 MOTION Partial Summary Judgment against Harry Deakins filed by P. H. Shrewsbury, J. R. Baker, J. C. Long, R. J. Jackson, D. B. Rogers, C. M. Wade, T. S. Pack and that Defendants' 235 objections to the PF&R be OVERRULED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 7/12/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mjp)
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 178 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 177 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge VanDervort; GRANTS David W. Miller's 153 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTS Robin Mavin's 155 Renewed Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion to Quash Service and DENIES Plaintiffs' 160 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 9/28/2012. (certified cc: Plaintiffs, Pro Se and counsel of record and cc: Magistrate Judge VanDervort) (arb)
July 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 176 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 170 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge VanDervort and ORDERS the 142 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, to Quash, filed by Robin Mavin and D. W. Miller be GRANT ED in part and DENIED in part. The Defendants' Motion is denied to the extent they move to dismiss and granted to the extent they seek to quash service. The Court further ORDERS that the time for service of Defendants Maven and Miller be EXTENDED until 09/01/2012. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 7/19/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mjp)
May 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 150 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Defendants' 136 MOTION to Compel Discovery Responses. Plaintiffs shall provide Defendants with the current residential addresses of Anthony Deakins and Sean Deakins by 6/7/2012, and shall notify Defendants promptly of any change in their residential addresses while this matter is pending. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 5/31/2012. (cc: Plaintiffs, Pro Se and counsel of record) (arb)
February 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 114 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying in part and granting in part Clinch Valley Medical Center's 95 MOTION to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum. The Motion is DENIED to the extent that CVMC requests the subpoena duces tecum be quashed, and GRANTED to the extent the CVMC requests the subpoena duces tecum be modified. It is further ORDERED that the return date on the subpoena duces tecum is MODIFIED to March 9, 2012. The parties are notified that the rulings set forth above may be contested by fil ing objections to this Order within ten days. If objections are filed, Judge Berger will consider the objections and modify or set aside any portion of the Order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 2/24/2012. (cc: Plaintiffs, Pro Se; counsel for Clinch Valley Medical Center, and counsel of record) (arb)
January 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 88 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' 63 MOTION to Compel. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel as Interrogatory Number 5 is DENIED and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel as Request for Production Number 2 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant Pack shall respond to Request for Production of Documents No. 2 by producing any performance reviews and citations/commendations relating to the performance of his supervisory duties by 2/10/2012. Defendants' 69 MOTION to Compel is GRANTED. Each plaintiff shall respond fully and completely and in conformity with the FRCvP to each Interrogatory and Request for Admission in issue by virtue of Defendants' Motions to Compel by 2/10/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 1/25/2012. (cc: plaintiffs, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deakins, Sr. et al v. Pack et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harry E. Deakins, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kay F. Deakins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. S. Pack
Represented By: Michael D. Mullins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. C. Long
Represented By: Michael D. Mullins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. J. Jackson
Represented By: Michael D. Mullins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. R. Baker
Represented By: Michael D. Mullins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. M. Wade
Represented By: Michael D. Mullins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P. H. Shrewsbury
Represented By: Michael D. Mullins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1 - 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?