Seay v. Cauley
Harry Ronald Seay |
E. K. Cauley |
1:2011cv00296 |
May 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
McDowell |
David A. Faber |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: this matter is TRANSFERRED to the Middle District of North Carolina pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1631. The Clerk is directed to REMOVE this matter from the Court's docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 5/5/2011. (certified cc: Petitioner, pro se and Clerk of Court for Middle District of North Carolina) (mjp) Modified on 5/5/2011 to correct title of order (mjp). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Seay v. Cauley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Harry Ronald Seay | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: E. K. Cauley | |
Represented By: | Silas B. Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.