Stay the Course West Virginia, et al v. Tennant, et al
Thomas Stephen Bailey, David Bailey, Pineville Lumber, Inc. and Stay the Course West Virginia |
Scott Ash and Natalie E. Tennant |
1:2012cv01658 |
May 23, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
Kanawha |
Irene C. Berger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER formalizes in writing an agreement entered into by and between Stay the Course West Virginia, David Bailey, Pineville Lumber, Inc. and Thomas Stephen Bailey ("Plaintiffs") and Natalie E. Tennant ("Secretary T ennant") (collectively, the "parties") which is more fully set forth in said order. The parties are directed to discuss the payment of costs and attorneys' fees and to provide this Court with a status report within thirty (30) days hereof. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 8/6/2013. (cc: counsel of record and any unrepresented party) (mjp) |
Filing 38 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiffs' 3 MOTION to Certify Class; denying as moot plaintiffs' 18 MOTION to Expedite their motion for class certification. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 1/17/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mjp) |
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting the Plaintiffs' 15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. A separate Preliminary Injunction Order will enter this day implementing the ruling contained in this opinion. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 8/9/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (arb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.