Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et al v. Baldini, et al
| Ameribank, Inc. |
| David G. Cogswell, James M. Sutton, Jack A. Baldini, Louis J. Dunham and Michael O'Brien |
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| 1:2012cv07050 |
| October 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| David A. Faber |
| Banks and Banking |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 Default of Promissory Note |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Plaintiff's 56 MOTION for Protective Order Concerning Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (ESI). Directing Plaintiff to take steps initially to locate ESI responsive to each of Mr. Dunham's requests. The parties shall work together in development of search terms which when applied to the ESI will yield documents and information responsive to Mr. Dunham's request and exclude non-responsive documents and information. Plaintiff shall upload ESI to Relativity organized and labeled in conformity with the search terms, make it available to Defendants and produce it in an agreed upon form. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 3/28/2014. (cc: counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing
120
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: by Judgment Order dated 9/30/2013, the court DENIED defendants' 21 , 24 and 26 MOTIONS to Dismiss. The reasons for that decision are given in this order. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 11/14/2013. (cc: counsel of record) (mjp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
