White v. Huntington National Bank
Plaintiff: Kenneth A. White
Defendant: Huntington National Bank
Case Number: 1:2012cv07503
Filed: November 8, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Bluefield Office
County: McDowell
Presiding Judge: R. Clarke VanDervort
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: the Court ADOPTS the 20 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, GRANTS 19 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Kenneth A. White, and directs the Clerk to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 7/12/2013. (cc: plaintiff, pro se and counsel of record) (mjp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Huntington National Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Huntington National Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth A. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?