Locke v. Butler
| Lisa Locke |
| Sandra Butler |
| 1:2013cv30050 |
| November 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| Monroe |
| David A. Faber |
| Dwane L. Tinsley |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court ADOPTS the 8 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Tinsley, DENIES AS MOOT Petitioner's 1 Section 2241 Petition and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this civil action from the court's active docket. The court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 12/1/2016. (cc: Petitioner and counsel of record) (arb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Locke v. Butler | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lisa Locke | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Sandra Butler | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
