Taylor v. Bureau of Prisons
Gregory J. Taylor |
Bureau of Prisons |
1:2013cv33391 |
December 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
McDowell |
Cheryl A. Eifert |
David A. Faber |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 24 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: the court DENIES a certificate of appealability; ADOPTS the factual and legal analysis contained within the 24 PF&R; DENIES petitioner's 1 petition for writ of habeas corpus; and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the court's docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 11/10/2015. (cc: Petitioner, pro se; and counsel of record) (mk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Taylor v. Bureau of Prisons | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Gregory J. Taylor | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.