Freeman v. United States of America
Antonio Freeman |
United States of America |
1:2017cv02279 |
April 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
McDowell |
Omar J. Aboulhosn |
David A. Faber |
Mandamus and Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court hereby ADOPTS the factual and legal analysis contained within the 4 PF&R, DISMISSES petitioner's 1 petition for a writ of mandamus, and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the court's docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 10/11/2017. (cc: Petitioner, pro se; attys) (mk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Freeman v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Antonio Freeman | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.