Johnson v. Williams
Alonzo Johnson |
Anthony Williams |
1:2017cv03348 |
June 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Bluefield Office |
Mercer |
Omar J. Aboulhosn |
David A. Faber |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: adopting the 10 Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn as follows: Plaintiff's 5 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs is DENIED; Plaintiff's 4 complaint is DISMISSED; and the Clerk is directed to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 9/30/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (mk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Williams | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alonzo Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Anthony Williams | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.