El-Amin v. United States of America
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 5, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court OVERRULES petitioner's 19 Objections to the PF&R; ADOPTS the factual and legal analysis contained within the 16 PF&R by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn; DISMISSES without prejudice petitioner' s 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241); DENIES petitioner's 2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; DENIES petitioner's 12 Emergency Motion for Release and DIRECTS the Clerk to dismiss this matter from the court's dock et. The court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Since the PF&R's 3/2/2018 issuance, petitioner has filed a flurry of motions, which the court liberally describes as follows: petitioner's 18 Motion to Amend His Complaint, petitioner 039;s 24 Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing to Question Defendant's Appellate Counsel, petitioner's 25 Emergency Motion for Expeditious Disposition of Petitioner's Motion to Amend, petitioner's 26 Motion to Correct Statutory Errors in Petitioner's Proposed Amended Complaint, petitioner's 28 Second Motion to Expedite, and petitioner's 36 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint. The court DENIES each of these motions. The court notes that its dismissal is without prejudice, leaving petitioner free to bring the Proposed Amended Petition before this court in a subsequent action. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 6/5/2018. (cc: petitioner, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?