Graham v. Dhar et al
| Janet Graham and Edna Marie McNeely |
| Sunil Kumar Dhar, Bluefield Clinic Company, LLC and Bluefield Hospital Company, LLC |
| 1:2018cv00274 |
| February 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| Mercer |
| David A. Faber |
| Personal Injury- Medical Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
156
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On 2/5/2024 and 3/4/2024, the court held hearings on the petition to settle the wrongful death claim against all defendants. At the hearing held on 3/4/2024, the court outlined the proposed distribution and no party o bjected thereto. Accordingly, the court determined that plaintiff's proposed distribution was fair and just and APPROVED it. Counsel for plaintiff should forward a copy of the court's order to potential beneficiaries. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 3/5/2024. (cc: counsel of record; unrepresented parties) (mk)
|
|
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing the parties to either submit something in writing to indicate whether the potential beneficiaries object to the proposed settlement amount or seek a hearing date where the court may make this inquiry. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 7/18/2023. (cc: counsel of record and unrepresented parties) (arb)
|
|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: plaintiff's 120 MOTION for Certification of Final Judgments: The court GRANTS in part plaintiff's motion, and consequently CERTIFIES its final judgments, under Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Proc edure, its Order granting summary judgment to defendant Bluefield Hospital Company, LLC d/b/a Bluefield Regional Medical Center ("BRMC"), (ECF No. 94), and the portion of its Order denying plaintiff's motion to alter and amend relating to granting summary judgment to defendant BRMC (ECF No. 113). The court DENIES in part plaintiff's motion and DECLINES TO CERTIFY its Order denying plaintiff's motion for sanctions and entry of default judgment, (ECF No. 93), and the porti on of its Order denying plaintiff's motion to alter and amend relating to denying plaintiff's motion for sanctions and entry of default judgment, (ECF No. 113). Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 8/28/2020. (cc: counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing
112
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court declines to exercise its discretion to allow video testimony because sufficiently compelling circumstances do not exist in this case. Defendants' 111 motion for video testimony is therefore DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 6/25/2020. (cc: counsel of record) (mk)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons expressed herein, defendant BRMCs 77 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the Count III claim by plaintiff against defendant BRMC is thus DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Senior Senior Judge David A. Faber on 12/19/2019. (cc: counsel of record) (mk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
