The City of Princeton, West Virginia v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation
| The City of Princeton, West Virginia |
| McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Mallinckrodt PLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., SpecGx LLC, Noramco, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East |
| 1:2018cv01242 |
| August 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Bluefield Office |
| Mercer |
| David A Faber |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 801 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CONFIRMATION from Northern District of Ohio that the case has been opened in that district as 1:18-op-46054, filed 09/12/2018. (kp) |
| Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-53) JUDICIAL PANEL ON MDL: certified copy from the Northern District of Ohio transferring this action to the USDC/NDOH for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407. Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel on 9/12/2018. (cc: attys) (ts) |
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION FROM JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION re: Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-53), MDL 2804. (ts) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT by The City of Princeton, West Virginia against AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., Cephalon, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC, McKesson Corporation, Noramco, Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., SpecGx LLC, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores East; with jury demand. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (taq) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mk) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores East, re: #1 Complaint,. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 Summons-Cardinal Health, Inc., #2 Summons-McKesson Corporation, #3 Summons-Wal-Mart Stores East) (mk) |
| CASE assigned to Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-6722265. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons-Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, #2 Proposed Summons-Cardinal Health, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons-McKesson Corporation, #4 Proposed Summons-Wal-Mart Stores East, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (mk) (Modified on 8/21/2018 to add revised Complaint) (mk). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
