Meadows v. Saul
Mark Meadows |
Andrew Saul |
1:2019cv00739 |
October 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
David A Faber |
Dwane L Tinsley |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held before the Administrative Law Judge. (Attachments: #1 002 Court Transcript Index, #2 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 004 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 006 Non Disability Related Development, #6 007 Disability Related Development, #7 008 Medical Records Part 1, #8 009 Medical Records Part 2)(Neil, Gregory) |
Filing 7 ANSWER TO #2 Complaint by Andrew Saul.(Neil, Gregory) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Mark Meadows for service upon Andrew Saul, Andrew Saul served on 10/15/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. Person Served: V. Dickerson. Return Receipt Card for Attorney General signed on 10/17/2019. Return Receipt Card for Commissioner of Social Security signed on 10/15/2019. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Lefler, Derrick) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew Saul, re: #2 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (mk) |
Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS re: Plaintiff's #1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. The applicant is hereby permitted to proceed without prepayment of costs of fees or the necessity of giving security therefor. The Clerk of the Court shall issue the summons(es). Plaintiff shall serve the summons(es) and complaint pursuant to Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 10/11/2019. (cc: counsel of record) (mk) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (arb) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION by Mark Meadows to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (arb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Meadows v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
Represented By: | Nora R. Koch |
Represented By: | Gregory P. Neil |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mark Meadows | |
Represented By: | Derrick W. Lefler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.