Sandlain v. (FCI) Mcdowell Warden
| Blake Sandlain |
| (FCI) Mcdowell Warden |
| 1:2020cv00273 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| David A Faber |
| Dwane L Tinsley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Blake Sandlain to Object to the #5 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, or in the Alternative, MOTION to Construe Petition as Mandamus (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (arb). (Modified on 5/18/2020 to add additional motion event)(mk). |
Filing 6
ORDER: The Clerk is directed to open a new civil action to address Petitioner's claim concerning his conditions of confinement under Bivens. The Clerk shall use the petition document herein, and its attachments, as the initiating document, and shall also docket Petitioner's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction therein. The Clerk shall assign the new civil action to appropriate judicial officers, who may order additional action as necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 5/7/2020. (cc: Petitioner) (arb)
|
|
Filing 5
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that the presiding District Judge DISMISS Petitioner's #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and this civil action, and DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE Petitioner's #4 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order with respect to this civil action. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. If the PF&R was served electronically, Objections are due by 5/21/2020. If the PF&R was served by mail, Objections are due by 5/26/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 5/7/2020. (cc: Petitioner) (arb)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Blake Sandlain for Temporary Restraining Order. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (arb) |
| Filing 3 ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY by Blake Sandlain for this Court to Consider in Standing Order Pending with this Court Pursuant to 2241 (arb) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Blake Sandlain against (FCI) Mcdowell Warden pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Documentation in Support, #2 Envelope) (arb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sandlain v. (FCI) Mcdowell Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Blake Sandlain | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: (FCI) Mcdowell Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
