Browning v. Reherman
Petitioner: Ashley E. Browning
Respondent: M. E. Reherman
Case Number: 1:2020cv00431
Filed: June 24, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE by Ashley E. Browning to #8 Order (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1) (arb)
July 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER AND NOTICE re: Respondent's #7 Response to Show Cause requesting that Petitioner's Petition be dismissed: Petitioner's reply shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before 8/13/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 7/16/2020. (cc: Petitioner, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
July 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE by M. E. Reherman to the Court's #5 Order. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Bailey, Jason)
July 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney re: #5 Order. Signed for by Robin Justice on 7/8/2020. (arb)
July 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241): Respondent shall file an Answer to the Petition by 8/3/2020 showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 9/1/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 7/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Reherman Certified Mail Receipt, #2 USA Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner, pro se; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition) (arb)
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 1BLUE001696. (mk) (Modified on 7/2/2020 to replace incorrect image)
July 2, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #4 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 1BLUE001696. ERROR: Incorrect image attached. CORRECTION: Replaced image. (mk)
June 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
June 24, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
June 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee (arb)
June 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Ashley E. Browning against M. E. Reherman pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241 (Attachments: #1 Documentation in Support, #2 Copy of Memorandum Opinion and Order directing the opening of a new civil action) (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Browning v. Reherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. E. Reherman
Represented By: Jason S. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ashley E. Browning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?