Cordell v. Warden
Petitioner: Kamalah Cordell
Respondent: United States and Warden
Case Number: 1:2020cv00542
Filed: August 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CORRECTED NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION by Matthew Ryan Blackwell appearing on behalf of Warden. (Blackwell, Matthew)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION by Matthew Ryan Blackwell appearing on behalf of United States. (Blackwell, Matthew)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The Clerk is directed to substitute as the respondent herein the Warden of Alderson Prison Camp in place of the United States of America. As to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), Respondent shall answer or otherwise respond to the Petition within 60 days of the entry of this Order showing cause, if any, why the relief should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to the Answer within 60 days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 9/9/2020. (cc: Petitioner; USA w/Section 2241 Petition) (arb)
September 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 1BLUE001722. (arb)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 APPLICATION by Kamalah Cordell to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter & Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. (mk)
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee (arb)
August 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 MOTION by Kamalah Cordell for Credit Towards Sentence for Detention During Pretrial (Attachment: #1 Administrative Remedy Documentation) (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cordell v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kamalah Cordell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Matthew Ryan Blackwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?