Buckman v. Reherman
| Silver Buckman |
| Warden Reherman |
| 1:2020cv00700 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| David A Faber |
| Dwane L Tinsley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
RETURN RECEIPT CARD mailed to Respondent re: #8 Order and Notice: Undelivered. (arb)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE by Reherman to the Court's #8 Order and Notice. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Lindsay, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 9
RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney re: #8 Order and Notice. Signed by Vicky Dickerson on 11/20/2020. (arb)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and #2 Motion to Receive Time Credit: Respondent shall by 12/31/2020 file an Answer to the allegations contained in Petitioner's Section 2241 Petition and Motion and show cause why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 1/21/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 11/17/2020. (Attachments: #1 Reherman Certified Mail Receipt, #2 U. S. Attorney Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner; Respondent and U. S. Attorney w/Section 2241 Petition and Motion) (arb)
|
|
Filing 7
LETTER to Silver Buckman, from Clerk, U. S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia dated 11/13/2020, returning $5.00 Money Order as filing fee previously paid. (mk)
|
|
Filing 6
Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 1BLUE001738. (arb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND NOTICE directing Petitioner to pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by 11/18/2020. Failure to comply with this Order and Notice will result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 11/4/2020. (cc: Petitioner) (arb)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE (mk)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION by Silver Buckman to Receive Time Credits Pursuant to First Step Act (Attachments: #1 Exhibits in Support, #2 Affidavit) (mk)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Silver Buckman against Warden Reherman pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (mk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Buckman v. Reherman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Reherman | |
| Represented By: | Matthew C. Lindsay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Silver Buckman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
