Montillo v. FPC Alderson
| Lauren Montillo |
| FPC Alderson |
| 1:2020cv00733 |
| November 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| David A Faber |
| Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff/Petitioner's #4 Letter-Form Motion for Extension of Time and for the Appointment of Counsel. To the extent Plaintiff/Petitioner requests an extension of time to comply with the Court's #3 Order and Notice, the #4 Letter-Form Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff/Petitioner shall have until 2/11/2021 to do so; failure to comply with the requirements of the #3 Order and Notice will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this matter without prejudice. To the extent Plaintiff/Petitioner requests the appointment of counsel, the #4 Letter-Form Motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 12/9/2020. (cc: Plaintiff/Petitioner w/Section 2241 Habeas Petition packet, including instructions, and copy of #3 Order and Notice) (arb)
|
|
Filing 4
LETTER-FORM MOTION by Lauren Montillo to Extend Time to Pay Filing Fee and to File Amended Complaint; LETTER-FORM MOTION by Lauren Montillo for Appointment of Counsel. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (arb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND NOTICE directing Plaintiff to notify the Court whether she is asserting a claim under Bivens, Section 2241, or both by filing the appropriate forms as more fully set forth herein. To the extent Plaintiff is attempting to assert a claim under both Bivens and Section 2241, Plaintiff must pursue such in separate actions by submitting the appropriate forms for each action (2241 forms and Bivens forms). Failure to (1) file a Complaint or Petition, and (2) either pay the filing fee or file an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by 12/11/2020 will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this matter without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 11/10/2020. (cc: Plaintiff with a Section 2241 Habeas Petition packet and a Bivens packet) (arb)
|
|
CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
|
Filing 1
LETTER-FORM COMPLAINT. (slr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Montillo v. FPC Alderson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lauren Montillo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FPC Alderson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
