Field v. State of West Virginia et al
| Dale P. Field, Jr. |
| John Doe #1, Bryan Kelly Lanham, State of West Virginia, Betsy Jividen, John Doe #3 and John Doe #2 |
| 1:2020cv00804 |
| December 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| David A Faber |
| Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONFIRMATION from Northern District of West Virginia that the case has been opened in that district as 1:20-cv-00280, filed 12/30/2020. (slr) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE directing that this matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, Elkins Division. Plaintiff is directed to address any further filings concerning this matter to that court. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 12/30/2020. (cc: Plaintiff, pro se) (arb)
|
| CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (arb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (arb) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION by Dale P. Field, Jr. to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (arb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
