Keaton v. Saul
| Lori Keaton |
| Andrew Saul |
| 1:2020cv00855 |
| December 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| David A Faber |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
CLERK'S ORDER pursuant to #6 Order, the referral of this civil action for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition is transferred from Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. Signed by Clerk of Court Rory L. Perry II on 12/28/2020. (cc: Magistrate Judge Eifert; Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER transferring this case to the Clerk of Court for reassignment of total pretrial management and submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 12/28/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATION of Non-Involvement in Matter by Dr. Robert Kropac by Lori Keaton re: the Court's #4 Order (Prudich, Gregory) (Modified on 12/21/2020 to remove link to #3 standing order) (mk).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER directing counsel to file with the Court a pleading certifying whether Dr. Kropac is or is not involved in this matter. Should Dr. Kropac be involved, the undersigned will direct that the Clerk rotate this matter to another Magistrate Judge in the District. Plaintiff/Counsel is ORDERED to file said pleading no later than 1/4/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 12/18/2020. (cc: counsel of record; parties acting pro se) (arb)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (arb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7831290. (Attachments: #1 Notice, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (arb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Keaton v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Nora R. Koch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lori Keaton | |
| Represented By: | Gregory S. Prudich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
