Harris v. Reherman
Petitioner: Sequioya Harris
Respondent: Warden Reherman
Case Number: 1:2020cv00858
Filed: December 18, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER AND NOTICE that Petitioner may file a reply in opposition to Respondent's #9 Response to Show Cause on or before 3/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 2/9/2021. (cc: Petitioner, pro se; counsel of record) (arb)
February 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RESPONSE by Reherman to the Court's #6 Order. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Lindsay, Matthew)
January 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from Warden Reherman re: #6 Order. Signature illegible; signed on 1/4/2021. (arb)
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney re: #6 Order. Signed by Vicky Dickerson on 12/31/2020. (arb)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241): Respondent shall file an Answer to the Petition by 2/9/2021 showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 3/9/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 12/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Reherman Certified Mail Receipt, #2 U. S. Attorney Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner, pro se; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition and Motion to Receive Time Credits) (arb)
December 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 1BLUE001757. (mk)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee (arb)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION by Sequioya Harris for Petitioner to Receive Time Credits Pursuant to the First Step Act (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibits A & B) (arb)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Sequioya Harris against Warden Reherman pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Reherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Reherman
Represented By: Matthew C. Lindsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sequioya Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?