Weems-Bey v. Kemper
| Adrian Weems Bey and Adrian Weems-Bey |
| Kemper and Mr. Kemper |
| 1:2021cv00069 |
| January 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| David A Faber |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ORDER This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and the Clerk is directed to remove this action from the docket of the court. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 2/17/2021. (cc: any unrepresented party) (mk)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION by Adrian Weems-Bey to Drop #1 Letter/Complaint (mk) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION that the District Court DISMISS Plaintiff's #1 Complaint and remove this matter from the Court's docket. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. If the PF&R was served electronically, Objections are due by 2/16/2021. If the PF&R was served by mail, Objections are due by 2/18/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 2/1/2021. (cc: Plaintiff, pro se) (mk) |
| CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mk) |
| Filing 1 LETTER-FORM COMPLAINT. (mk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
