Mackie-Hatten v. Carver
Petitioner: Stephanie Mackie-Hatten
Respondent: M. Carver
Case Number: 1:2021cv00248
Filed: April 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing Petitioner to file a reply to #6 RESPONSE within sixty (60) days after service of the Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/26/2021. (cc: Petitioner; counsel of record) (mk)
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by M. Carver for #6 Response to Order. (Lindsay, Matthew) (Modified on 5/25/2021 to add link to #6 response to order)
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RESPONSE by M. Carver to the Court's #5 Order. (Lindsay, Matthew)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing the Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Order. If the petition involves a guilty plea or a sentencing issue, and the transcript of the plea hearing or sentencing hearing would aid in the resolution of the petition, Respondent is ORDERED to submit same with the answer, unless the transcript is already a part of the record. Petitioner may file a reply to the answer or response of the Respondent within sixty (60) days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/7/2021. (cc: Petitioner; USA w/2241 Petition) (mk)
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number CHAR018985. (mk)
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing Petitioner to pay the filing fee of five dollars, or submit to the Court a fully completed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 4/29/2021. (cc: Petitioner w/IFP Application) (arb)
April 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
April 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Stephanie Mackie-Hatten against M. Carver, Warden pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachment: #1 Exhibits in Support) (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mackie-Hatten v. Carver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. Carver
Represented By: Matthew C. Lindsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Stephanie Mackie-Hatten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?