Hicks v. Canterbury et al
| Amos Gabriel Hicks |
| Steven D. Canterbury, Booker T. Stephens, Francine Spencer, Janet Murphy and William Murphy |
| 1:2021cv00469 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| David A Faber |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LETTER RESPONSE to Amos Gabriel Hicks, from Clerk, USDC/SDWV, dated 9/17/2021, re: case status. (arb) |
| Filing 5 LETTER to Clerk, USDC/SDWV, from Amos Gabriel Hicks dated 9/12/2021, requesting status of latest filing. (mk) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT/MOTION by Amos Gabriel Hicks to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (Attachment: #1 Resident Activity Report) (arb) |
| CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mk) |
| Filing 2 LETTER to Clerk of Court, from Amos G. Hicks dated 8/20/2021, re: requesting updated docket sheet. (kew) |
| Filing 1 PETITION AS CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Notices to Defendants, #2 Proposed Summonses, #3 Copies of Petition for Defendants, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope) (kew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
