Gilliam v. Warden
Petitioner: Megan Brook Gilliam
Respondent: United States of America, Alderson FPC and Warden
Case Number: 1:2022cv00166
Filed: April 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Order showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a reply to the answer within sixty (60) days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/9/2022. (cc: Petitioner; USA w/2241 Petition) (arb)
May 6, 2022 Filing 5 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number CHAR020393. (arb)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk to update the docket to reflect that the proper Respondent is Warden, Alderson FPC; further directing Petitioner, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, to either pay the requisite five dollar filing fee or submit to the Court an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 4/18/2022. (cc: Petitioner w/second IFP Application) (arb)
April 8, 2022 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
April 6, 2022 CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
April 6, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE. (lca)
April 6, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Megan Brook Gilliam against Alderson FPC, United States of America pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (lca) (Modified on 5/9/2022 to replace image of Attachment 1) (arb).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilliam v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Megan Brook Gilliam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Alderson FPC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?