Beard v. Warden
Dallas Beard |
Warden |
1:2022cv00407 |
September 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Omar J Aboulhosn |
David A Faber |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 MOTION by Warden for Extension of Time to File Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) to 12/14/2022; Petitioner's Reply due by 1/16/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 11/10/2022. (cc: Petitioner, pro se; counsel of record) (mk) |
Filing 11 MOTION by Warden for Extension of Time to File Response as to #6 Order to December 14, 2022. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn.(Adams, Troy) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION by Troy Daniel Adams appearing on behalf of Warden. (Adams, Troy) |
Filing 9 UPDATED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Dallas Beard against Warden, FCI McDowell pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241 to include signature. (Attachment: #1 Cover Letter) (arb) |
Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney re: #6 Order; signed by Jon Snyder on 10/17/2022. (arb) |
Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from Warden, FCI McDowell on 10/17/2022 re: #6 Order. (arb) |
Filing 6 ORDER directing Respondent to file an Answer to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by 11/14/2022 showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 12/14/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 10/13/2022. (Attachments: #1 Warden, FCI McDowell Certified Mail Receipt, #2 U. S. Attorney Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner, pro se; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition and Memorandum in Support) (arb) |
Filing 5 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 1000056. (arb) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee (arb) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Dallas Beard in support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (arb) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Dallas Beard against Warden, FCI McDowell pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachment: #1 Cover Letter) (arb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Beard v. Warden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Dallas Beard | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden | |
Represented By: | Troy Daniel Adams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.