Washburn v. Warden
Petitioner: Cherie Washburn
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 1:2022cv00562
Filed: December 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 AMENDED REPLY by Cherie Washburn to Include Additional Information and Correct Omission of Certificate of Service re: #6 Response by Warden, FPC Alderson to Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Envelope) (arb)
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REPLY by Cherie Washburn to #6 Response to Order to Show Cause. (arb)
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER directing Petitioner to file reply to Respondent's #6 Response to Order to Show Cause within 60 days after service of same. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/23/2023. (cc: Petitioner; counsel of record) (mk)
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Warden (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Arthur, Christopher)
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the #1 Emergency Motion for CARES ACT Home Confinement/Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) within 60 days of the entry of this Order showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a reply to the answer within 60 days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 12/16/2022. (cc: Petitioner; USA w/2241 Petition) (arb)
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt No. 5000085. (arb)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee (arb)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CARES ACT HOME CONFINEMENT/PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Cherie Washburn against Warden, FPC Alderson pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8) (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washburn v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cherie Washburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Christopher R. Arthur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?