Washington v. Warden
Petitioner: Demond Washington
Respondent: United States of America and Warden
Case Number: 1:2023cv00032
Filed: January 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing Petitioner to file a reply to the Respondent's #7 Response to Order to Show Cause within sixty (60) days after service of same. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 2/22/2023. (cc: Petitioner and counsel of record) (arb)
February 21, 2023 Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Warden (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Arthur, Christopher) (Modified on 2/21/2023 to remove terminated party filer) (mk).
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing the Clerk to substitute the Warden of FCI McDowell as Respondent in this case; directing Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) within 60 days of the entry of this Order showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a reply to the answer within 60 days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/23/2023. (cc: Petitioner; USA w/2241 Petition and Memorandum in Support) (arb)
January 23, 2023 Filing 5 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 2000719. (mk)
January 18, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee (arb)
January 18, 2023 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
January 17, 2023 CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
January 17, 2023 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Demond Washington in support of Ground One re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (mk) (Modified on 1/19/2023 to rotate images) (mk).
January 17, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Demond Washington against United States of America pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits in Support, #2 Envelope) (mk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Demond Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Christopher R. Arthur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Christopher R. Arthur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?