Jackson v. Rokosky
| Michael Jackson |
| E. Rokosky |
| 1:2023cv00090 |
| February 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| David A Faber |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION that the District Court GRANT the #9 MOTION by Michael Jackson to Dismiss and remove this matter from the Court's docket. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. If the PF&R was served electronically, Objections are due by 3/24/2023. If the PF&R was served by mail, Objections are due by 3/27/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 3/10/2023. (cc: Petitioner, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION by Michael Jackson to Dismiss re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (mk)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE directing Petitioner to file reply to Respondent's #7 Response to Order to Show Cause by 4/11/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 3/1/2023. (cc: Petitioner, pro se; counsel of record) (mk)
|
|
Filing 7
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by E. Rokosky (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Arthur, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 6
RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney re: #4 Order. Signed by Karen Jordan on 2/10/2023. (arb)
|
|
Filing 5
RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from E. Rokosky, Warden on 2/10/2023 re: #4 Order. (arb)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER directing the Respondent to file an Answer to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by 3/10/2023 showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 4/11/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 2/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Warden Rokosky Certified Mail Receipt, #2 U. S. Attorney Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner, pro se; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition) (arb)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
|
|
Filing 2
Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt No. 1000125. (arb)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Michael Jackson against E. Rokosky, Warden, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope) (arb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Rokosky | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Jackson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: E. Rokosky | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R. Arthur |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
