Gonzalez v. Rokosky
Defendant: Rokosky
Petitioner: Ricardo Gonzalez
Case Number: 1:2023cv00343
Filed: April 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE/REPLY by Ricardo Gonzalez to the #6 MOTION by Rokosky to Dismiss and Memorandum of Law in Support to Grant Petitioner's Motion (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Envelope) (arb)
June 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER AND NOTICE directing Petitioner to file a Response, on or before 7/6/2023, to the #6 MOTION by Rokosky to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, MOTION by Rokosky for Summary Judgment. Following service of Petitioner's Response to Respondent's Motion, Respondent will have seven (7) business days within which to file a Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 6/5/2023. (cc: Petitioner, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
June 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION by Rokosky to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support re: #1 Petition. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1). Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn.(Arthur, Christopher) (Modified on 6/2/2023 to add additional motion relief and link to #1 petition) (mk).
May 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from Warden Rokosky on 4/28/2023 re: #4 Order. (arb)
April 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing Respondent to file an Answer to the allegations contained in Petitioner's #1 Section 2241 Petition by 6/6/2023. Petitioner may file a Reply or Objections to the Respondent's Answer by 7/6/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 4/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt as to Rokosky, #2 Certified Mail Receipt as to USA) (cc: Petitioner, pro se; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition) (mk)
April 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt No. 5000199. (arb)
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Ricardo Gonzalez against Rokosky pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documentation, #2 Envelope) (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Rokosky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ricardo Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rokosky
Represented By: Christopher R. Arthur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?