Chatha v. U. S. Department of Agricultural
| Ghulam Chatha |
| U. S. Department of Agricultural and Jonathan Betts |
| 1:2023cv00529 |
| August 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| David A Faber |
| Agriculture Acts |
| 07 U.S.C. ยง 2023 - Food Stamp Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONFIRMATION from Western District of Virginia that the case has been opened in that district as 7:23-cv-00554, filed 8/28/2023. (ts) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE directing that this matter be transferred for additional proceedings to the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Richard H. Poff Federal Building, 210 Franklin Road, S.W., Roanoke, VA 24011-2204; the Plaintiff is directed to address any further information concerning this matter to that court. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 8/23/2023. (cc: Plaintiff) (lca)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mk) |
| Filing 2 Filing Fee: $402.00, Receipt Number 2001523. (mk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (mk) |
| CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
