Laurian-Matuz v. Rokosky
Pedro L. Laurian-Matuz |
United States of America and Warden Rokosky |
1:2023cv00607 |
September 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Omar J Aboulhosn |
David A Faber |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER directing the Clerk to modify the Docket Sheet to reflect that Warden Rokosky is the proper Respondent herein, both in the style of the case and the short style at the top of the Docket Sheet re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241); further directing Petitioner to file an Amended Section 2241 Petition by 10/12/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 9/12/2023. (cc: Petitioner, pro se w/blank Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 and relevant instructions) (mk) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee. (arb) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Pedro L. Laurian-Matuz against United States of America pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (arb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.