Curtis v. Warden
Petitioner: Leslie Erin Curtis
Respondent: United States of America and Warden
Case Number: 1:2023cv00618
Filed: September 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER AND NOTICE directing Petitioner to file a Reply to the #7 Response to Order to Show Cause on or before 12/14/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 10/25/2023. (cc: Petitioner, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
October 24, 2023 Filing 7 RESPONSE by Warden to the Court's #5 Order. (Bailey, Jason) (Modified on 10/25/2023 to remove terminated party filer) (kew).
October 5, 2023 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from Warden, FPC Alderson on 10/5/2023 re: #5 Order. (arb)
October 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing the Clerk to modify the Docket Sheet to reflect that the Warden of FPC Alderson is the proper Respondent herein, both in the style of the case and the short style at the top of the Docket Sheet; directing the Respondent to file an Answer to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by 11/14/2023 showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 12/14/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 10/3/2023. (Attachments: #1 Warden, FPC Alderson Certified Mail Receipt, #2 U. S. Attorney Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner, pro se; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition) (arb)
October 2, 2023 Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt No. 2001711. (arb)
September 19, 2023 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
September 18, 2023 CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
September 18, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE. (arb)
September 18, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Leslie Erin Curtis against United States of America pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curtis v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Leslie Erin Curtis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Jason S. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Jason S. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?