Steele v. United States of America
Petitioner: Lacosta Steele
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 1:2023cv00774
Filed: December 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2024 Filing 115 Document filed only in criminal case; not applicable to this proceeding. (mk)
January 3, 2024 Filing 114 Document filed only in criminal case; not applicable to this proceeding. (mk)
December 28, 2023 Filing 113 Document filed only in criminal case; not applicable to this proceeding. (mk)
December 20, 2023 Filing 112 Document filed only in criminal case; not applicable to this proceeding. (mk)
December 6, 2023 Filing 111 Document filed only in criminal case; not applicable to this proceeding. (mk)
December 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER as to Lacosta Steele directing the United States to file an answer, within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Order, to the #106 MOTION by Lacosta Steele to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Movant may, if she wishes, file a reply to the answer of the United States within sixty (60) days after service of same. Cross Reference Criminal Case No. 1:21-cr-00187-02. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 12/6/2023. (cc: Judge, Movant and USA) (arb)
December 5, 2023 Filing 108 CLERK'S NOTICE OF FILING OF 2255 MOTION by Lacosta Steele to U. S. Attorney with copy to Movant. (mk)
December 5, 2023 Filing 107 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: Judge Faber; Magistrate Judge Eifert; Petitioner; USA; USM; USP) Cross Reference Criminal Number 1:21-cr-00187-02. (klc)
December 4, 2023 Filing 109 LETTER-FORM MOTION by Lacosta Steele to Appoint Counsel for assistance with a 2255 and for sentencing guideline reduction; requesting forms for the Amendment 821 sentencing guideline reduction. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. (mk)
December 4, 2023 CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
December 4, 2023 Filing 106 MOTION by Lacosta Steele to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255. Cross Reference Criminal Case Number 1:21-cr-00187-02. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (mk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steele v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lacosta Steele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Jennifer Rada Herrald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?