Purpera v. Rokosky
Frank Craig Purpera, Jr. |
Warden Rokosky |
1:2023cv00818 |
December 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
David A Faber |
Dwane L Tinsley |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 REPLY by Frank Craig Purpera, Jr. to #8 Response to Order to Show Cause. (Forman, Isaac) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Rokosky (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Lindsay, Matthew) |
Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney re: #6 Order and Notice. Signed by M. Wallace on 1/22/2024. (arb) |
Filing 6 ORDER AND NOTICE It is ORDERED that Respondent shall by 2/14/2024 file an Answer to the allegations contained in the #1 Petition by Frank Craig Purpera, Jr. for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and supporting #5 Memorandum in support showing cause, if any, why the writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 2/28/2024. As Petitioner is now represented by counsel, all future service copies of court orders and other filings in this matter will be transmitted only to counsel via Notice of Electronic Filing through the court's CM/ECF program. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 1/17/2024. (Attachments: #1 Warden Rokosky Certified Mail Receipt, #2 U. S. Attorney Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner and counsel; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition and Memorandum of Law) (arb) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM by Frank Craig Purpera, Jr. in support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) (Forman, Isaac) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Isaac Ralston Forman on behalf of Frank Craig Purpera, Jr. (Forman, Isaac) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
Filing 2 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 1000268. (mk) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Frank Craig Purpera, Jr. against Rokosky pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment 5, #6 Attachment 6, #7 Attachment 7, #8 Attachment 8, #9 Attachment 9, #10 Attachment 10, #11 Attachment 11, #12 Attachment 12, #13 Attachment 13, #14 Attachment 14, #15 Attachment 15) (mk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Purpera v. Rokosky | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Frank Craig Purpera, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Isaac Ralston Forman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Rokosky | |
Represented By: | Matthew C. Lindsay |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.