Hernandez v. Rokosky
| Marco Hernandez |
| E. Rokosky |
| 1:2024cv00091 |
| February 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| David A Faber |
| Dwane L Tinsley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER AND NOTICE re: #8 MOTION by E. Rokosky to Dismiss; directing that responses are due 5/16/2024, with replies due 5/27/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 4/25/2024. (cc: Petitioner, counsel of record) (lca)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM by E. Rokosky in support of #8 MOTION by E. Rokosky to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment re: 1 Petition(Arthur, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by E. Rokosky to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment re: #1 Petition (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2). Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley.(Arthur, Christopher) (Modified on 4/17/2024 to add link to #1 complaint) (mk). |
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from E. Rokosky, Warden on 3/7/2024 re: #5 Order and Notice. (arb) |
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney on 3/11/2024 re: #5 Order and Notice. (arb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND NOTICE It is ORDERED that Respondent shall by 4/19/2024 file an Answer to the allegations contained in the #1 Petition by Marco Hernandez for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) showing cause, if any, why the writ of habeas corpus sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to the Respondent's Answer by 5/15/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 3/5/2024. (Attachments: #1 E. Rokosky, Warden Certified Mail Receipt, #2 U. S. Attorney Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition) (arb)
|
| Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt No. 2002261. (arb) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee. (arb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Marco Hernandez against E. Rokosky, Warden pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Envelope) (arb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hernandez v. Rokosky | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marco Hernandez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: E. Rokosky | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R. Arthur |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
