Bruey v. Cutwright
Petitioner: Amber Rewis Bruey
Respondent: Warden Cutwright
Case Number: 1:2024cv00354
Filed: July 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: David A Faber
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER AND NOTICE directing Petitioner to file a Reply to the #7 Response to Order to Show Cause on or before 9/30/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 8/28/2024. (cc: Petitioner, pro se and counsel of record) (arb)
August 27, 2024 Filing 7 RESPONSE by Cutwright to the Court's #5 Order to Show Cause. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Bailey, Jason)
July 31, 2024 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney on 7/30/2024 re: #5 Order. (arb)
July 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing Respondent to file an Answer to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by 8/30/2024 showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 9/30/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 7/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Warden Cutwright Certified Mail Receipt, #2 U. S. Attorney Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner, pro se; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition) (arb)
July 19, 2024 Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 2002767. (mk)
July 17, 2024 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (klc)
July 16, 2024 CASE assigned to Senior Judge David A. Faber. (klc)
July 16, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee. (arb)
July 16, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Amber Rewis Bruey against Warden Cutwright pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Cover Page - Attachments, #2 Attachment 1, #3 Attachment 2, #4 Attachments 3 - 5, #5 Attachment 6, #6 Attachments 7 - 17, #7 Attachment 18, #8 Attachments 19 - 20, #9 Attachment 21, #10 Attachment 22, #11 Attachment 23, #12 Attachment 24, #13 Attachment 25, #14 Attachment 26, #15 Attachment 27, #16 Attachment 28, #17 Attachment 29, #18 Attachment 30, #19 Attachment 31, #20 Attachment 32, #21 Attachment 33, #22 Attachment 34, #23 Attachment 35, #24 Attachment 36, #25 Envelope) (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bruey v. Cutwright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Amber Rewis Bruey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Cutwright
Represented By: Jason S. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?