Allen v. United States of America
Case Number: 2:2006cv00710
Filed: September 13, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Chambers
Presiding Judge: Mary E. Stanley
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER Adopting 158 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by the Magistrate Judge; denying 141 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) as supplemented and amended filed by Jeffrey Dajuan Allen and dismisses this matter from the docket. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 4/14/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party, Mag. Judge) (tmr)
March 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 158 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (recommending that the presiding District Judge deny Movant's 141 Section 2255 Motion as supplemented and amended and dismiss this matter from the docket). Cross Reference Criminal Case Number 2:02-00074. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 4/6/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley on 3/20/2009. (cc: attys; movant) (taq)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?