Wilkerson v. Target et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv00866
Filed: October 13, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Charleston Office
Presiding Judge: John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
Presiding Judge: Mary E. Stanley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendant's 56 MOTION for Summary Judgment; adopting 65 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; directing that supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims is hereby declined; directing that this action is dismissed and stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 5/27/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party, Mag. Judge) (tmr)
May 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 65 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (recommending that the presiding District Judge GRANT Charleston Police Department's 56 MOTION for Summary Judgment, and decline supplemental jurisdiction over her state law claims). Objections to Proposed F&R due by 5/22/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley on 5/7/2009. (cc: plaintiff; attys) (taq)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilkerson v. Target et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?