Price v. Correctional Medical Services, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit West Virginia Southern District Price v. Correctional Medical Services, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex

Price v. Correctional Medical Services, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex

Plaintiff:	Mark Dewayne Price
Defendant:	Correctional Medical Services, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex
Case Number:	2:2008cv00259
Filed:	June 9, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County:	Monroe
Presiding Judge:	David A. Faber
Presiding Judge:	Mary E. Stanley
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 10, 2010	Filing 81 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to the court's 3/31/2010 77 Order, the court SUSTAINS defendant's 74 objections to the magistrate judge's findings; GRANTS defendant's 54 motion for summary judgment; and DENIES plaintiff's 58 motion to dismiss defendant's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 5/10/2010. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; attys) (taq)
March 31, 2010	Filing 77 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER for reasons to be explained in a memorandum opinion to be issued forthwith, the court SUSTAINS defendant's objections to the magistrate judge's findings; granting defendant's 54 MOTION for Summary Judgmen t; denying plaintiff's 58 MOTION to Dismiss defendant's motion for summary judgment; the court withholds its judgment order pending issuance of the explanatory memorandum opinion. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 3/31/2010. (cc: pro se plaintiff, attys) (mkw)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 10, 2010

Filing 81 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER pursuant to the court's 3/31/2010 77 Order, the court SUSTAINS defendant's 74 objections to the magistrate judge's findings; GRANTS defendant's 54 motion for summary judgment; and DENIES plaintiff's 58 motion to dismiss defendant's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 5/10/2010. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; attys) (taq)

March 31, 2010

Filing 77 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER for reasons to be explained in a memorandum opinion to be issued forthwith, the court SUSTAINS defendant's objections to the magistrate judge's findings; granting defendant's 54 MOTION for Summary Judgmen t; denying plaintiff's 58 MOTION to Dismiss defendant's motion for summary judgment; the court withholds its judgment order pending issuance of the explanatory memorandum opinion. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 3/31/2010. (cc: pro se plaintiff, attys) (mkw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Price v. Correctional Medical Services, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Dewayne Price
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Medical Services, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?